Ketidakjujuran Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Program Studi Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini

  • Herdian Herdian Fakultas Psikologi, universitas muhammadiyah purwokerto
  • Sri Lestari
Keywords: Academic Dishonesty, Prospective Educator, character


Being a teacher must have a positive character, one of which is honesty. Honesty can be known based on academic behavior during a student. In fact, there are currently many dishonest behaviors in prospective educators, especially in early childhood education program students. The purpose of this study is to describe academic behavior, especially academic dishonesty in students of early childhood education programs at University X in Central Java, Indonesia. The focus of research is on forms of dishonest behavior when working on Tasks, Middle Semester Exams and final semester examinations, and the causes of dishonesty occur. This study uses a phenomenological qualitative approach with a data collection tool with in-depth interviews. The research subjects were 4 students in the 7th semester who took courses in the Teacher Education Study Program and Early Childhood Education. The results showed that the form of academic dishonesty in prospective students of early childhood teacher educators was asking for answers, asking for the essence of answers, seeing answers (without being known by friends), bringing cheats and searching for answers on the internet. Academic dishonesty factor is caused by the question that comes out when the exam is not studied or not in accordance with what is learned when studying, does not know the answer, does not understand the material delivered during lectures and learning is not optimal.


Download data is not yet available.


Anderman, E. M., & Murdock, T. B. (Eds.). (2011). Psychology of academic cheating. Elsevier.

Cizek, G. J. (2003). Detecting and preventing classroom cheating: Promoting integrity in assessment. Corwin Press

Colnerud, G., & Rosander, M. (2009). Academic dishonesty, ethical norms and learning. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 34(5), 505-517.

Fredrika, M. E., & Prasetyawati, W. (2013). Gambaran kecurangan Akademik pada Siswa Kelas 6 Sekolah Dasar. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan) jakarta Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Indonesia.

Handayani & Baridwan. (2013). Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi perilaku ketidakjujuran akademik: modifikasi theory of planed behaviour. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 2 (1) dipetik Agustus 3, 2015 dari

Hetherington, E. M., & Feldman, S. E. (1964). College cheating as a function of subject and situational variables. Journal of Educational Psychology, 55(4), 212.

Marshall, L. L., & Varnon, A. W. (2017). Attack on Academic Dishonesty: What" Lies" Ahead? Journal of Academic Administration in Higher Education, 13(2), 31-40.

Lestari, S., & Asyanti, S. (2015). Apakah siswa SMP berperilaku jujur dalam situasi ulangan? The 2nd University Research Coloquium 2015 ISSN 2407-9189

Moeck, P. G. (2002). Academic Dishonesty: Cheating among Community College Students. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 26, 479-491

Ungusari, E. (2015). Kejujuran dan Ketidakjujuran Akademik pada Siswa SMA yang Berbasis Agama. Skripsi (tidak diterbitkan). Fakultas psikologi, Universitas Muammadiyah Surakarta). Psikologi Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta

How to Cite
Herdian, H., & Lestari, S. (2018). Ketidakjujuran Akademik Pada Mahasiswa Calon Guru Program Studi Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi, 3(2), 151-161.