Meta Analisis: Deferensiasi Gaya Belajar dengan Metode Pembelajaran

  • A. Jauhar Fuad Institut Agama Islam Tribakti Kediri
Keywords: Differentiation of learning styles, learning styles, Learning Methods

Abstract

This paper intends to review with the student's learning style dimensions of divergent and convergent. Both interact with the methods of debate and methods of discussion. Differences in learning styles impact on student learning, student learning outcomes specify a maximum learning. Therefore, teachers need to understand the learning style that is owned by the students, before applying the learning method that will be chosen. This paper concludes convergent learning style has a stronger interaction with the method of debate while the divergent learning style has a stronger interaction with the method of discussion

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. Daftar Pustaka

Degeng, I. N. S. (2012). Ilmu pembelajaran, klasifikasi variabel untuk pengembangan teori dan penelitian. Bandung: Aras Media.

DePorter, B. & Hernacki, M. (2000). Quantum learning. Bandung: PT. Kaifa.

Dundes, L. (2001). Small group debates: fostering critical thinking in oral presentations wiih maximal class involvement. Teaching Sociology. 2. 237-243.

Joyce, B., Weil, M. & Calhoun, E. (2009). Models of teaching (8th ed.). Boston: Pearson.

Kade, A. (2014). Pengaruh pembelajaran kooperatif tipe jigsaw dan gaya belajar terhadap pemahaman konsep fisika siswa SMA negeri di Palu. Disertasi. Malang: PPS Universitas Negeri Malang tidak diterbitkan.

Kerlinger, F. N. & Lee, H. B. (2000). Foundations of behavioral research (4th ed.). Holt, NY: Harcourt College Publishers.

Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experimental learning: Experience as The Source of Learningand Development. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 85

Kolb, A. Y. & Kolb, D. A. (2005). The Kolb Learning Style Inventory Version 3.1. Online. http://www.haygroup.com/tl/Questionnaires_Workbooks/Kolb_Learning_Style_Inventory.aspx. diakses 15 September 2014.

Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E. & Mainemnelis, C. (2000). Experiential learning theory: Previous research and new directions. In R. J. Sternberg & L. F. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on cognitive, learning, and thinking styles. Marwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Kuncoro, T. (2012). Pengaruh strategi pembelajaran problem solving dan gaya belajar kolb terhadap hasil belajar bidang matematika rekayasa mahasiswa jurusan teknik sipil. Disertasi. Malang: PPS Universitas Negeri Malang tidak diterbitkan.

Madden, K. K. (2010). Engaged Learning with the inquiry-based question cluster discussion technique: student outcomes in a history of economic thought course, Sauthern Economic Journal, 77 (1), 224-239.

Moncure, S. & Francis, C. (20110. Foundations of Experiential Education as Applies to Agroecology. Lincoln: University of Nebraska.

Omelicheva, M. Y. (2007). Resolved: academic debate should be a part of political science curricula, Journal of Political Science Education 3, 161-177.

Reigeluth, M. C. (1983). Instructional-Design theories and models: an overview of their current status. Hillsdale. N.J.: Lawrence Erlbaum Aassosites.

Sautter, P. (2007). Designing discussion activities to achieve desired learning outcomes: choices using mode of deliversy and structure, Journal of Marketing Education, 29(2), 122-131.

Sihes, A. J. B. & Abdullah, H. B. (2010). Gaya pembelajaran dan hubungannya dengan pencapaian akademik pelajar tahun tiga UTM Skudai, Johor. Malaysia: Fakulti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia. http://eprints.utm.my/11312/1/Gaya_Pembelajaran_Dan_Hubungannya_Dengan_Pencapaian_Akademik_Pelajar_Tahun_Tiga_UTM_Skudai.pdf. Diakses 2 Oktober 2014.

Sihes, A. J. B. & Aziz, A. Q. B. (2010). Gaya pembelajaran pelajar-pelajar cemerlang tahun empat fakulti pendidikan. Malysia: Fakilti Pendidikan Universiti Teknologi Malaysia.http://eprints.utm.my/10775/1/gaya_ pembelajaran pelajar.pdf. Diakses 2 Oktober 2014.

Simon, S. J. (2000). The relationship of learning style and training method to end-user computer satisfaction and computer use: a strucrural equation model. Information Technology, Learning, and Performance Journal, 18(1), 41-48.

Sims, R. R. & Sims, S. J. (1995). The Importance of Learning Style, Understanding the Implications for Learningm Course Design, and Education. Westport: Greenwood Press.

Slavin, R. E. (2006). Educatinal psychology: theory and practice. New York: Boston.

Swisher, K. & Schoorman, D. (2001). Learning styles: Implications for teachers. In C. F. Diaz (Ed.), Multicultural education in the 21st century. New York: Longman.

Tulbure, C. (2011). Do different styles require differentiated teaching strategis?. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 11, 155-159.

Woolfolk, A. (2008). Educational psychology: Active learning. Pearson Education.

Published
2016-12-31
How to Cite
Fuad, A. J. (2016). Meta Analisis: Deferensiasi Gaya Belajar dengan Metode Pembelajaran. Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi, 1(2), 151-165. https://doi.org/10.33367/psi.v1i2.284