TITLE AND AUTHOR(S)’ IDENTITY
The abstract must reflect the overall substance of the article content. The abstract must be clear, descriptive, and provide a brief description of the problem under study, including the reasons for the study, or the importance of the research topic, research methods, and summary of the results. The abstract ends with a response regarding the significance of the findings or a brief conclusion. The abstract should be written in 2 languages (English and Indonesian), in 1 paragraph, single-spaced, containing 150-200 words.
Keywords: 3–5 Keywords
Keywords contain basic ideas or substance of articles that represent the area being investigated which can make it easier for readers to find articles. Keywords are written under abstract.
The introduction contains an adequate background to show the gap of the study, objectives, and benefits, theoretical review, previous studies (state of the art) as a basis for "gap analysis" statements of the scientific novelty of articles, and hypotheses (if any). A literature review is not permitted to be written in a separate subheading but is integrated with an explanation of the background of the study to show the state of the art or the novelty of scientific findings. This section is written at a maximum of 20% of the manuscript.
This section describes in detail the identifying variables, research subjects, instruments, and methods, including the statistical analysis techniques used (in a maximum of 10% of the total manuscript pages). This section should inform the reader about the types and methods used by the authors in this study. Accurate and appropriate information should be ensured for further research. Quoting definitions directly from the books should be avoided in this section.
In the Findings section, descriptive statistics, assumption tests, and hypothesis tests are presented along with the analysis in a sequential or integrated manner (no more than 15% of the entire manuscript). Thus, this section must contain data analysis results. If possible, tables/graphs/figures/ that contain interpretations of data analysis should be attached to make the data analysis can be easily understood. Tables/graphs/figures may not contain raw data that has not been analyzed.
This section should critically explore the research findings, how the findings are related to the previous studies, and the relevance of literature/sources (should be at least 45% of the entire manuscript). This section allows you to present a substantial interpretation of the results of the analysis and comparison with previous studies based on a review of relevant, the most recent, and the main literature of the past 10 years.
The conclusion must answer the research objectives which is a summary of research findings. The conclusion should be presented in a short, clear, and concise manner based on research findings and discussion and written in paragraph form (not numerical), consisting of the synthesis of findings from data analysis and discussion and highlighting findings new contribution to the development of psychology as a science.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT (IF ANY)
This section contains acknowledgement or thanks to sponsors, grants, resource persons, or parties who have an important role in conducting the study.
References are sorted according to the alphabet. All that is referred to in the article must be written in this section and vice versa. Use Reference Applications such as Zotero, Mendeley, etc. for citation and references following the American Psychological Association (APA) format.
The followings are the example of writing References.
Baranik, L. E., & Eby, L. (2016). Organizational citizenship behaviors and employee depressed mood, burnout, and satisfaction with health and life. Personnel Review, 45(4), 626–642. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1108/PR-03-2014-0066
Brockner, J., Flynn, F. J., Dolan, R. J., Ostfield, A., Pace, D., & Ziskin, I. V. (2006). Commentary on “radical HRM innovation and competitive advantage: The Moneyball story.” Human Resource Management, 45(1), 127–145. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrm
Dávila, M. C., & Finkelstein, M. A. (2015). Organizational citizenship behavior and well-being : Preliminary results. January 2013. https://doi.org/10.5923/j.ijap.20130303.03
Diener, E., Napa Scollon, C., & Lucas, R. E. (2009). The evolving concept of subjective well-being: The multifaceted nature of happiness. In Social Indicators Research Series. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2354-4
Jex, S. M., & Britt, T. W. (2008). Organizational psychology. New York: John Willey & Sons Inc.
Julianto, V., & Subandi, -. (2015). Membaca Al Fatihah Reflektif Intuitif untuk Menurunkan Depresi dan Meningkatkan Imunitas. Jurnal Psikologi, 42(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.22146/jpsi.6941
More information can be downloaded template journal
|Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi|
|Sinta 2 No.148/M/KPT/2020|
|Focus and Scope|
|Peer Review Process|
|Open Acces Policy|
|About This Publishing System|
Journal An-Nafs: Kajian Penelitian Psikologi
Program Studi Psikologi Islam Fakultas Dakwah IAI-Tribakti Kediri.
Jl. KH. Wahid Hasyim 62 Kediri Telp. (0354) 772879
Jawa Timur 64114 Indonesia
Contact Person: 085736778360
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.